57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Testprofil

Continental
PremiumContact 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Anzahl der Tests
36
18
10
4
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
3.1
6.1
6.0
12.0
Neuester Test
2023
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
303
47
109
111
Nass
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Aquaplaning - längs
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Nassbremsen
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Aquaplaning - quer
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Handling - nass
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Kreisbahn nass
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Seitenführung
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Trocken
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Trockenbremsen
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Handling - trocken
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Komfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Außengeräusch
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Komfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Innengeräusche
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Offroad
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
Kosten
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Rollwiderstand
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kilometerstand
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Preis-Wert
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Gegenseitige Prüfungen

OrganisationJahreszeitJahrDimension
ADACADAC
Sommer
2023205/55 R16Ansehen

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen