58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Continental sContact gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Continental
sContact
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
13
5
18
8
4
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#1
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
4.3
2.2
6.1
5.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
16
123
63
47
146
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - nass
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Komfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Continental sContact Michelin Primacy 4+ Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Firestone Roadhawk 2 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.