57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Continental VanContact Winter gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Continental
VanContact Winter
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
2
14
6
4
Optimale Position
#1
#8
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
1.0
13.4
4.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2019
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
153
146
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Continental VanContact Winter
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Continental VanContact Winter
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Continental VanContact Winter
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Continental VanContact Winter
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trockenleistung
Continental VanContact Winter
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Continental VanContact Winter
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Continental VanContact Winter
94%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Continental VanContact Winter
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kreisbahn nass
Continental VanContact Winter
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Continental VanContact Winter
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Continental VanContact Winter
95%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nassfahrverhalten
Continental VanContact Winter
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Schnee
Vertrauensniveau
Continental VanContact Winter
75%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Continental VanContact Winter
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Continental VanContact Winter
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Continental VanContact Winter
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Continental VanContact Winter
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Continental VanContact Winter
43%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Continental VanContact Winter
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Eis
Vertrauensniveau
Continental VanContact Winter
74%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen