57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Destination HP gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Destination HP
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
14
18
15
4
Optimale Position
#3
#8
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.0
13.4
6.1
9.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2017
2026
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
35
153
47
226
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Destination HP
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Destination HP
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Destination HP
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Handling - nass
Firestone Destination HP
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Destination HP
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Destination HP
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kosten
Firestone Destination HP
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Destination HP
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Destination HP
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Komfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Destination HP
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Destination HP
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Trocken
Firestone Destination HP
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Destination HP
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen