57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: Firestone Destination HP gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Firestone Destination HPObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Destination HP

R15 – R20
BFGoodrich AdvantageObere-Mittelklasse
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Firestone
Destination HP
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
14
5
4
Optimale Position
#3
#8
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.0
13.4
2.8
3.3
Neuester Test
2017
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
35
153
139
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Destination HP
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Destination HP
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Destination HP
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Destination HP
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Handling - nass
Firestone Destination HP
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Destination HP
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kosten
Firestone Destination HP
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Destination HP
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Komfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Destination HP
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Trocken
Firestone Destination HP
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Best tyres for evsBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Auch vergleichen

Firestone Destination HP vs Firestone RoadhawkFirestone Destination HP vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Firestone Destination HP vs Cooper ZEON 4xS SportFirestone Destination HP vs Firestone Roadhawk 2BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNBFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone RoadhawkBFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen