57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: Firestone Destination HP gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Firestone Destination HPObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Destination HP

R15 – R20
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVPremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2
R16 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Destination HP
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
1
3
18
5
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.0
3.7
6.1
2.2
Neuester Test
2017
2025
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
35
36
47
63

Nass

Nass
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - nass
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Reifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Auch vergleichen

Firestone Destination HP vs Firestone RoadhawkFirestone Destination HP vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Firestone Destination HP vs Cooper ZEON 4xS SportFirestone Destination HP vs Firestone Roadhawk 2Falken e.Ziex vs Maxxis Premitra AS AP3Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.ZiexFalken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXTFalken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich