57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Pilot Sport 5
Anzahl der Tests
1
36
4
18
15
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.1
3.3
6.1
3.4
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2026
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
303
40
47
70

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
82%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
78%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
83%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
85%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
87%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
95%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
73%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
68%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen