57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
3
18
4
4
3
5
4
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#1
#2
#3
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
1.3
6.1
3.3
12.0
3.7
2.2
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
23
47
40
111
36
63
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen