57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Anzahl der Tests
1
3
4
18
4
4
15
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#3
#1
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
1.3
12.0
6.1
3.3
3.3
9.0
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
23
111
47
40
40
226

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen