57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Cooper Zeon CS8 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Cooper
Zeon CS8
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
1
14
18
13
4
5
Optimale Position
#12
#9
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
19.7
6.1
4.3
3.3
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
147
47
123
40
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Cooper Zeon CS8
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Cooper Zeon CS8
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Cooper Zeon CS8
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Cooper Zeon CS8
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Cooper Zeon CS8
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Cooper Zeon CS8
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Cooper Zeon CS8
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Cooper Zeon CS8
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Cooper Zeon CS8
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen