57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Semperit Speed-Life 3 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Semperit
Speed-Life 3
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
21
18
14
4
28
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
11.9
6.1
18.1
3.3
2.3
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2024
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
165
47
116
40
67

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen