57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Semperit Speed-Life 3 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Semperit
Speed-Life 3
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
21
14
18
4
28
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
11.9
18.1
6.1
3.3
2.3
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2026
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
165
116
47
40
67

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen