57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
16
4
5
15
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#3
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
5.5
12.0
2.8
9.0
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2023
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
153
111
139
226

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich