57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
10
4
13
3
5
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
6.0
3.3
4.3
3.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
109
40
123
36
63

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen