57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Semperit Speed-Life 3 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Semperit
Speed-Life 3
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
14
21
4
28
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#2
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
18.1
11.9
3.3
2.3
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2026
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
116
165
40
67

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen