57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Michelin
e.Primacy
Michelin
Primacy 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
36
4
5
4
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
3.1
12.0
4.8
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2023
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
303
111
158
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen