57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Turanza 6

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
18
28
4
15
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
6.1
2.3
3.3
6.1
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2024
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
47
67
40
229

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
76%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
76%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
78%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
65%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
51%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich