57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
18
4
5
4
28
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#2
#1
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
6.1
3.3
4.8
12.0
2.3
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2024
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
47
40
158
111
67

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich