57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kleber Dynaxer HP4 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Kleber Dynaxer HP4Obere-Mittelklasse
KleberKleber

Dynaxer HP4

7.2
R14 – R17
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
18
11
4
1
4
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#1
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
6.1
11.6
12.0
1.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2024
2024
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
47
122
111
66
40

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Reifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Auch vergleichen

Firestone Multihawk 2 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HMFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Dunlop Sport BluResponseGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Cooper ZEON CS8Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Barum Bravuris 5 HMGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenDunlopGT

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen