57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental SportContact 7 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
SportContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
18
16
3
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
3.3
6.1
1.2
3.7
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2026
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
40
47
124
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental SportContact 7
87%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen