57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Bridgestone Turanza T005 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
33
1
4
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#3
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
12.0
4.1
1.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2025
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
111
658
66
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
80%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
63%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen