57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
18
28
5
1
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
6.1
2.3
2.2
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
47
67
63
66

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen