57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
18
13
36
3
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
6.1
4.3
3.1
3.7
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
2025
2023
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
47
123
303
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen