57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
4
3
18
15
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#3
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
12.0
1.3
6.1
9.0
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2025
2026
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
111
23
47
226
Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen