57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
4
18
3
4
3
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
12.0
6.1
1.3
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
111
47
23
40
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen