58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Semperit Speed-Life 3 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Semperit
Speed-Life 3
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
14
18
29
13
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
18.1
6.1
2.3
4.3
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2026
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
116
47
68
123

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.