57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Kleber Dynaxer HP4 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
11
13
18
4
1
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
11.6
4.3
6.1
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
122
123
47
40
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen