57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Bridgestone Turanza T005 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
33
18
4
28
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
4.1
6.1
3.3
2.3
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2025
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
658
47
40
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen