57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
18
28
4
15
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
6.1
2.3
3.3
9.0
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
47
67
40
226

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen