57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
18
3
4
5
3
4
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
6.1
1.3
3.3
2.2
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
47
23
40
63
36
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen