57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
18
4
5
28
3
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#2
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
6.1
3.3
2.2
2.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2024
2026
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
47
40
63
67
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen