57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
5
18
3
4
5
5
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
2.2
6.1
3.7
3.3
2.8
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2025
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
63
47
36
40
139
63

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen