57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Turanza T005 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Turanza T005Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Turanza T005

8.8
R14 – R23
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
4
33
18
28
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
3.3
4.1
6.1
2.3
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2026
2025
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
40
658
47
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste -Reifen für ElektrofahrzeugeBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Auch vergleichen

Firestone Multihawk 2 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Firestone Multihawk 2 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HMMichelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5Michelin e.Primacy vs BFGoodrich AdvantageMichelin e.Primacy vs Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformanceGoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenDunlopGT

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen