58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
4
30
7
5
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
3.3
2.3
2.3
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2026
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
40
68
139
63

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
81%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
81%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Offroad
Vertrauensniveau
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
81%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Firestone Multihawk 2 Michelin e.Primacy GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Continental PremiumContact 7 Hankook Ventus Evo Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.