57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
4
18
5
14
28
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
3.3
6.1
2.2
5.5
2.3
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2026
2024
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
40
47
63
700
67

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich