57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Petlas Imperium PT515 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Petlas
Imperium PT515
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Anzahl der Tests
1
5
4
36
18
4
Optimale Position
#12
#13
#2
#1
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
24.0
3.3
3.1
6.1
12.0
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2026
2023
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
11
40
303
47
111

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Petlas Imperium PT515
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Petlas Imperium PT515
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Petlas Imperium PT515
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Petlas Imperium PT515
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Petlas Imperium PT515
30%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Petlas Imperium PT515
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Petlas Imperium PT515
46%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Petlas Imperium PT515
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Petlas Imperium PT515
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Petlas Imperium PT515
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Petlas Imperium PT515
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Petlas Imperium PT515
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Petlas Imperium PT515
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Petlas Imperium PT515
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen