58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 gegen Continental WinterContact TS 870

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Anzahl der Tests
23
24
17
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
2.7
1.7
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
4
176
302
80

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Schnee
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bremsen auf Schnee
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Schnee Handling
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Schneetraktion
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Schnee Slalom
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Schnee-Beschleunigung
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
97%
Nass
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Handling - nass
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
98%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Preis-Wert
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Komfort
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Eis
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
23%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.