57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multiseason 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multiseason 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
13
18
24
28
Optimale Position
#6
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.9
6.1
2.7
2.3
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
61
47
151
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multiseason 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multiseason 2
48%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Schnee
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schnee Handling
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schneetraktion
Firestone Multiseason 2
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Firestone Multiseason 2
86%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Schnee Slalom
Firestone Multiseason 2
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Kosten
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Multiseason 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Komfort
Firestone Multiseason 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Komfort
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Trocken
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen