58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Continental EcoContact 6 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
EcoContact 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Anzahl der Tests
8
6
18
15
Optimale Position
#3
#6
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.0
11.8
6.1
9.0
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
146
680
47
226

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
Continental EcoContact 6
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
Continental EcoContact 6
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Continental EcoContact 6
41%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
Continental EcoContact 6
58%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Nassfahrverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
62%
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental EcoContact 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Continental EcoContact 6
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Trockenleistung
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental EcoContact 6
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Offroad
Vertrauensniveau
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Continental EcoContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
Continental EcoContact 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental EcoContact 6
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Innengeräusche
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Continental EcoContact 6
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Firestone Roadhawk 2 Continental EcoContact 6 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Kumho Ecsta PS71 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.