57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental WinterContact TS 870 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
6
18
17
4
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
4.7
6.1
1.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
146
47
80
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen