57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Anzahl der Tests
6
18
4
5
15
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
4.7
6.1
3.3
4.8
9.0
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
146
47
40
158
226

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Nassfahrverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Trockenleistung
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen