57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
6
4
18
5
3
5
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
4.7
3.3
6.1
4.8
3.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
146
40
47
158
36
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen