57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
6
5
18
4
3
5
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
4.7
4.8
6.1
3.3
3.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
146
158
47
40
36
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen