57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Firestone RoadhawkObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.2
R15 – R21
BFGoodrich AdvantageObere-Mittelklasse
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
21
14
16
4
5
Optimale Position
#2
#8
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
13.4
5.5
3.3
2.8
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2023
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
153
153
40
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste -Reifen für ElektrofahrzeugeBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Auch vergleichen

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNFirestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3BFGoodrich Advantage vs Maxxis Premitra HP5BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcorunBFGoodrich Advantage vs Michelin Primacy 4BFGoodrich Advantage vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliMichelinHankookGoodyearNokianFalkenKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenMaxxisBridgestone

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen