57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Pirelli Cinturato (C3) gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Pirelli
Cinturato (C3)
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
21
18
7
4
3
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
6.1
2.7
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
165
47
31
40
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen