57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Michelin Primacy 4+

Firestone RoadhawkObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.2
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Michelin Primacy 4+Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 4+

7.6
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3) PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Anzahl der Tests
21
16
4
1
13
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
5.5
3.3
1.0
4.3
Neuester Test
2024
2023
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
165
153
40
66
123

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Best tyres for evsBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Auch vergleichen

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNFirestone Roadhawk vs BFGoodrich AdvantageGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Continental UltraContactGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Dunlop Sport BluResponseGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Cooper ZEON CS8Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen