Vergleich: Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S gegen GT RADIAL ClimateActive gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Budget

Fortuna

Eco Plus 2 4S

R13

VS

Budget

GT

RADIAL ClimateActive

CrossClimate 2

9.1

R15 – R21

Auch vergleichen mit

Cinturato All Season SF3

Quatrac

CrossClimate 2

Testprofil

Eco Plus 2 4S

RADIAL ClimateActive

CrossClimate 2

Anzahl der Tests

1

3

24

Optimale Position

#10

#5

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

10.0

7.3

2.7

Neuester Test

2025

Verfügbare Größen

—

59

151

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

74%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

Aquaplaning - quer

Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S

69%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

72%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Aquaplaning - längs

Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S

84%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

68%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

79%

Nassbremsen

Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S

76%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

70%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Handling - nass

Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S

87%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

80%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Schnee

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

73%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Schneetraktion

Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S

89%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

75%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Bremsen auf Schnee

Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S

82%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

84%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

90%

Schnee Slalom

Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S

79%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

66%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

93%

Schnee Handling

Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S

86%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

66%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Komfort

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

72%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

73%

Komfort

Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S

86%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

83%

Außengeräusch

Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S

86%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

84%

Trocken

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

72%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Trockenbremsen

Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S

90%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Handling - trocken

Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S

88%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

74%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

82%

Kosten

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

69%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

Rollwiderstand

Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S

88%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

80%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Best snow tyres Best tyres for evs Beste Trockenhandling reifen Beste Regenreifen Reifen mit bestem Handling Die Leisesten reifen Die günstigsten reifen Beste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

VS

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Auch vergleichen

GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2

GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate+

Nach Marke durchsuchen

Vergleich: Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S gegen GT RADIAL ClimateActive gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Eco Plus 2 4S

RADIAL ClimateActive

CrossClimate 2

Testprofil

Abmessungen und Preise

Rankings entdecken

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

Auch vergleichen

Nach Marke durchsuchen

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen