57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Fulda EcoControl HP2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
8
18
13
6
4
Optimale Position
#4
#1
#1
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.8
6.1
4.3
4.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
30
47
123
146
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Fulda EcoControl HP2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Fulda EcoControl HP2
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Fulda EcoControl HP2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Trocken
Fulda EcoControl HP2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Fulda EcoControl HP2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Fulda EcoControl HP2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Komfort
Fulda EcoControl HP2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Fulda EcoControl HP2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rollwiderstand
Fulda EcoControl HP2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Tread pattern comparison

Fulda EcoControl HP2
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen