57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Fulda EcoControl HP2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
8
13
18
4
3
Optimale Position
#4
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.8
4.3
6.1
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
30
123
47
40
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Fulda EcoControl HP2
65%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Fulda EcoControl HP2
63%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Fulda EcoControl HP2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kreisbahn nass
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
Fulda EcoControl HP2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trocken
Fulda EcoControl HP2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Fulda EcoControl HP2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Komfort
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Innengeräusche
Fulda EcoControl HP2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kosten
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Fulda EcoControl HP2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rollwiderstand
Fulda EcoControl HP2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Tread pattern comparison

Fulda EcoControl HP2
Michelin Primacy 4+
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen