58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
18
14
4
1
7
Optimale Position
#1
#8
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
13.4
3.3
1.0
2.3
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
153
40
27
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
63%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
58%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
68%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
63%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
63%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
63%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
64%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
62%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
63%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
65%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
61%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
63%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
54%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.